Print Page
March 14, 2019 | By S&H
Posted in: S&H IP Blog | U.S. Supreme Court
Posted in: S&H IP Blog | U.S. Supreme Court
Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, et al.
On October 26, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari, in part, to review Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, et al. The question before the Supreme Court is whether the government is a ”˜person”™ who may petition to institute review proceedings under the 2011 America Invents Act (“AIA”).
On January 4, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Iancu v. Brunetti. On appeal from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”), the Supreme Court will answer the question of whether § 2(a) of the Lanham Trademark Act (“§ 2(a)”), which prohibits the federal registration of “immoral” or “scandalous” trademarks (“scandalous provsion”), is a violation of the First Amendment”™s free speech clause.
March 14, 2019 | By S&H
Posted in: S&H IP Blog | U.S. Supreme Court
Posted in: S&H IP Blog | U.S. Supreme Court
Mission Product Holdings Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC
On October 26, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to review Mission Product Holdings Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC. The question before the Supreme Court is whether, under 11 U.S.C. § 365 (“§ 365”) of the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor”™s rejection of a license agreement terminates the obligations of the agreement, including the loss of a trademark license.
March 14, 2019 | By S&H
Posted in: S&H Firm News
Posted in: S&H Firm News
Staas and Halsey LLP Attorneys Attending the 2019 Global IP Exchange conference in Berlin, Germany
March 14, 2019 | By S&H
Posted in: S&H Firm News
Posted in: S&H Firm News
Staas and Halsey LLP in Top 10 U.S. Law Firms with Best Alice § 101 Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Allowance Rates
On February 7, 2019, Juristat.com released an analytical study of which U.S. law firms were the best at overcoming Alice rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 101.

