Print Page
S&H IP Blog
April 28, 2021 | By Gene M. Garner II | An Nguyen
Posted in: S&H IP Blog | U.S. Supreme Court
Posted in: S&H IP Blog | U.S. Supreme Court
United States v. Arthrex Inc. – Constitutionality of PTAB Judge Appointments
A recent case between two medical device companies raised the question of the constitutionality of the method in which Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) judges are appointed. PTAB judges are administrative patent judges who examine patents whose validity is questioned and hear appeals from patentees whose patent applications have […]
Please choose article to Read More on: U.S. SUPREME COURT 1 – Google LLC vs. Oracle America, Inc. ”“ U.S. copyright protection for software interfaces U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 1 – Amgen Inc. v Sanofi, Aventisub LLC ”“ CAFC heard argument that may influence COVID-19 drug […]
December 17, 2020 | By S&H
Posted in: S&H IP Blog | USPTO News
Posted in: S&H IP Blog | USPTO News
USPTO to Adjust Trademark Fees Effective January 2, 2021
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is set to increase certain trademark fees effective January 2, 2021.
December 17, 2020 | By S&H
Posted in: S&H IP Blog | U.S. Court of Appeals For The Federal Circuit
Posted in: S&H IP Blog | U.S. Court of Appeals For The Federal Circuit
St. Jude Medical, LLC v. Snyders Heart Valve LLC
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuti) in St. Jude Medical, LLC v. Snyders Heart Valve LLC held that the broadest reasonable interpretation of a claim must be considered in light of the specification.
December 17, 2020 | By S&H
Posted in: S&H IP Blog | U.S. Court of Appeals For The Federal Circuit
Posted in: S&H IP Blog | U.S. Court of Appeals For The Federal Circuit
IQASR vs. Wendt
In IQASR vs Wendt, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a district court”™s decision to invalidated US Patent. No. 9, 132, 432 due to indefiniteness. At issue in the case was the term “magnetic fuzz”.