Yearly Archives: 2018
Posted in: S&H IP Blog | U.S. Court of Appeals For The Federal Circuit
Core Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. v. LG Electronics, Inc. – §101 patent eligible
On January 25, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“the Federal Circuit”) released its opinion in Core Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. v. LG Electronics, Inc., affirming the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas decisions: (1) to deny summary judgment that four claims from Core Wireless”™ patents are directed to patent ineligible subject matter; (2) to deny judgment as a matter of law that another patent anticipates the asserted claims; and (3) to deny judgment as a matter of law that the asserted claims are not infringed.
Posted in: S&H Firm News
Staas & Halsey LLP Licensing Executive Society International (LESI) San Diego, California
Staas & Halsey LLP is pleased to note that Mr. David Pitcher, a partner in Staas & Halsey LLP, attended the LESI annual conference in San Diego, California, from April 29 to May 1, 2018.
Posted in: S&H IP Blog | U.S. Court of Appeals For The Federal Circuit
Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
On February 14, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“the Federal Circuit”) found in Aatrix Software, Inc. v. Green Shades Software, Inc. that Aatrix Software, Inc. (“Aatrix”) was entitled to file its proposed second amended complaint, holding that the District Court erred to the extent it granted the motion to dismiss filed by Green Shades Software, Inc. (“Green Shades”).
Staas & Halsey LLP is pleased to note that Mr. Paul Kravetz, a partner in Staas & Halsey LLP, was a panelist on the webinar hosted by The Knowledge Group, at https://www.theknowledgegroup.org, entitled “Artificial Intelligence and The Patent Law: Promises and Perils Event.”
Nothing points to the arrival of spring in Washington D.C. quite like the full bloom of the cherry blossom trees and the National Cherry Blossom Festival.